The donors of tomorrow?

I am a member of Generation X, which approximately includes those of us born between 1965 and 1976. There are approximately 51 million of us living in the United States. In front of us our generation is the uber-generation called “Baby Boomers” (approx 1946 – 1964 and 79 million strong) and behind us are “The Millennials” (approx 1977 – 1998 and 76 million of them). There is some argument over date ranges and even the numbers, but let’s try to stay focused on the big picture.

We can all agree that the donors of today are primarily Baby Boomers and Gen X individuals, which means the donors of tomorrow (and already starting to regularly donate) will be The Millennials.

When it comes to my generation, I usually use me and my experiences  as a lens:

  • I haven’t physically owned a checkbook since 1998
  • I just quit my job to open my own consulting practice so I don’t need to wait for Boomers in front of me to retire and so I can live life by my own rules
  • I give to charities much differently than my mom and dad
  • I hate it when the non-profits I support try to institute rules around my philanthropy
  • I love technology
  • I hate to create boundaries between work and home and charity

I am very different from my parents and their friends. I can see it very clearly. There has been and always will be generational differences. It is natural and there is nothing wrong with talking about it.

I have a sister who was born in 1979 (and depending on who you listen to she is either a Millennial or right on the threshold). As with my parents and their generation, I can likewise see that I am very different from my sister and her friends. She values different things than me, she interacts with the world differently than me, and she seems to operate by a different set of rules.

As a former executive director of a non-profit organization, I know how much time that I spent trying to cultivate, solicit and steward “the donors of today” (aka Boomers and Gen Xers). It was exhausting work. I also know how much time I spent trying to do the same with “the donors of tomorrow” (aka Millennials). If you could hear me talking, you’d hear crickets because I was entirely focused on Boomers and Xers as I know most of you are, too.

With approximately 7,000 Boomers retiring every single day in America, non-profit leaders need to start paying attention to this sea change because retirement changes a donor’s profile, giving patterns and capacity to give. More importantly, more and more Millennials are engaging in philanthropy each and every day. The face of the average non-profit organization’s donor database is likely to start changing very quickly.

With this change will likely come an adjustment to our cultivation, solicitation and stewardship strategies. For example, we know that Millennials exhibit a high level of volunteerism. This suggests that non-profits wanting to engage “the donors of tomorrow” might want to invest in volunteer infrastructure (e.g. volunteer management / human resources, systems, structures, opportunities, etc).

We know who the donors of tomorrow are, but do we know what makes them tick? How to engage them? How to best solicit them? How to steward them and demonstrate ROI? I suspect not, but there is good news:

  • The Case Foundation is sponsoring the 2011 Millennial Donor Summit in just a few weeks. It is 100% virtual. You can register and participate online.
  • There have been studies done that tell us a lot about this generation. You can download and read it. You can share it with your resource development committee. You could engage a focus group of Millennials and ask them to explore what they think it means for your organization.
  • There are Millennial non-profit bloggers,  like Jessica Journey, who you can follow in order to better understand a Millennial generation’s point of view on philanthropy.

There is much work to be done if our organizations are going to be sustainable.

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

Strategic planning and donors

I have a good friend who is a classically trained organizational development professional. In a previous professional life, I employed him to work on a few different projects. In hindsight, he became a coach for me and I remember he used to always insist that the only way you get performance is by designing the process to accomplish exactly what you need … “performance by design”.

I started thinking about this in a strategic planning context this morning while walking the dogs. So, when I got back home into the delightful air conditioning (it is HOT in Chicago today), I googled the search words “strategic planning models”.  Click here to see more than 10 pages of process diagrams and countless pages of graphics.

If you need an explanation that doesn’t make your head hurt, I think our friends at managementhelp.org do a much better job of aggregating everything into five essential models. My “coach-friend” preferred the organic model and specifically liked one called “The Search Conference“.

With two degrees in urban planning and having facilitated countless strategic planning processes for non-profit organizations, I’ve learned that different situations require different models. However, regardless of the path you choose, it needs to engage those who you hope will get involved in future action for your organization.

With this being said, it is a mistake to involve just board and staff in a planning process. I believe whatever process is chosen, it needs to be inclusive of all stakeholders and for non-profit organizations this obviously includes donors. Here are a few of my random thoughts (regardless of which model you choose):

  • Ask key donors to volunteer on the ad hoc planning committee
  • Survey donors using paper surveys, electronic surveys and/or phone surveys (remember that one size doesn’t fit all and a diversity of responses requires varied survey instruments)
  • Interview donors one-on-one
  • Focus group of donors
  • If you are using a “search conference” model, invite donors to come to the conference and participate

Your strategic plan sets a direction and vision for your organization. If you want donors to invest in this vision, doesn’t it make sense to include them in the planning process?

Has anyone had success getting donors outside of your board volunteers and auxiliaries involved in a strategic planning process? Or do you have any suggestions? If so, please use the comment box and share. Thanks!

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

Young donors

When I was a young teenager, I was very active in the Boy Scouts of America. At the age of 14, my Eagle Scout project took me on a civics adventure that started on the streets of my community … took me to city hall … which in turn lead me to the Illinois Department of Transportation … and ended up in the Governor’s office.

I very clearly remember learning the the following lessons:

  • You can fight city hall (and win)
  • It is amazing what a small group of people can accomplish when they put their minds to it
  • Public policy decision-makers and politicians are people, too, and put their pants on one leg at a time just like me
  • Kids can be active and engaged citizens in our community … it isn’t just an “adults’ world” out there.

I was reminded of these early lessons in life today while reading Twitter. I came across a link to a website trumpeting a company’s initiative to engage kids in making a difference in their communities. As I clicked around, I found a gentle reminder that kids raise money for worthy causes all the time.

While I am always a little concerned about using kids as “sales people” to sell cookies and popcorn and wrapping paper and candy bars, I am reminded of how powerful a “case for support” becomes when a group of kids are behind it and pushing.

Here is a link to that website: http://kidswhogive.com/about-kids-who-give/ 

If you have any stories about young people as donors or fundraising volunteers, I’d love to hear from you. Please drop me a line using the comment section below.

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

A dog’s life: Part 5 of 5

This is the last of five posts focusing on Frederick Reichheld’s book “The Loyalty Effect” and how the concept of “loyalty” effects for-profit and non-profit corporations equally. If you don’t own a copy of this book, I suggest you buy it, read it, and change your approach to doing business.

So, we’ve talked about the economics of creating loyalty, the three cogs in the loyalty machine (customers, investors, and employees),  the benefits of creating loyalty, identifying and cultivating the right customers, investors and employees, and the importance of measurement systems with connectivity to incentives & org culture. Today, we will end this “loyalty series” with a brief (and incomplete) discussion about “how to build loyalty”.

Here just a few things Reichhold says in his final few chapters that hit me as important:

  • We need to keep circling back to the question of “how do we build value” for customers, investors and employees. Filtering everything we do through this lens should keep us on the path towards building loyalty.
  • When starting to develop a loyalty-based program, we shouldn’t start with “tactics” but rather we should think strategically. There is a time and place for developing operational tactics, but it is later in the change leadership process.
  • Loyalty leaders are guided by principles: 1) focus the organization’s mission around loyalty and not revenues & profit and 2) use partnerships to “align, motivate and manage”.
  • Loyalty leaders use other loyalty-based companies to benchmark against and learn from (e.g. State Farm, American Express, Northwestern Mutual, A. G. Edwards, Chic-fil-A, and Leo Burnett).

When wading through all of these concepts, two things stuck out: 1) non-profit leaders need to focus on creating “value” for donors and employees and 2) we need to better utilize the power of “partnerships”.

From a non-profit perspective, it is hard to know what “creates value” for donors because many of them are not receiving anything tangible in return for their contribution (special event donors are obviously an exception and so are some NPR pledge drive recipients). What one donor perceives as value might not be seen as valuable by someone else. This is where the idea of “partnership” comes into play and what Penelope Burk says about a donor-centered approach to fundraising. In other words, we need to engage our donors in answering the questions around “creating value” (note – she surveys tens of thousands of donors every year in search of this question). Here are a few ideas you might consider for your organization:

  • Annual in-person meetings with our Top 50 or Top 100 lifetime donors with frank and open discussions about what the non-profit organization can do to create value
  • Focus groups with diverse donor groups and even lapsed donors with frank and open discussions about what the non-profit organization can do to create value
  • Donor surveys getting at the idea of “donor satisfaction”

Of course, tactically speaking there are many different “loyalty tools” in our resource development tool chest (e.g. newsletters; e-blasts; stewardship receptions; programs; activities; volunteer opportunities; mission moments; etc). However, unless we understand what our employees, board volunteers, and donors “value” as part of their involvement with our organization, we cannot effectively employee these tools.

It essentially boils down to communication and follow-through on what you learn.

The other aspect of “partnership” that we haven’t really talked about for non-profit organizations is how to engage and connect customers, investors and employees (aka donors, board volunteers and employees) with each other. One easy way to do this is through any planning process (e.g. resource development plan, strategic plan, stewardship plan, etc). Remember — planning is a means and not an end. Or stated another way — planning is an “engagement activity” and a process that you employ with those you want to get involveddown the road in some capacity.

The idea of building a “loyalty-based” organization is complex. So much so, that Reichheld didn’t just write “The Loyalty Effect,” he also wrote a follow-up book titled “Loyalty Rules” and developed an interesting website with additional resources. My five-part blog series just scratches the surface of this topic. I encourage you to do a lot more reading and then circle back share what you’ve learned with the rest of us.

I’ll end on this note … making the transition from a transactional resource development program to a loyalty-based and donor-centered culture is not something that can be done overnight. It is a change initiative that probably will require you to engage external assistance to help you and all of your key stakeholders frame and guide the process. (That is my self-promotional message for this week. LOL Enjoy the weekend & I’ll see you again on Monday)

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

A dog’s life: Part 4 of 5

This is my fourth of five posts focusing on Frederick Reichheld’s book “The Loyalty Effect” and how the concept of “loyalty” effects for-profit and non-profit corporations equally. If you don’t own a copy of this book, I suggest you buy it, read it, and change your approach to doing business.

I once worked for a smart boss who said, “What get’s measured, gets done! ” Of course, she said it in a very crisp British accent. And she was right.

Reichheld spends all of chapter eight talking about measuring loyalty and creating a more balanced dashboard tool that includes loyalty measurements. I especially liked his point that “… measurement lies at the very heart of both vision and strategy.”  Here is a little more from Reichheld (page 217) on how important measurement is:

“Measurement is the business idiom. Just as language shapes thought and communication, measures shape the attitudes and behavior of a business organization. The choice of what a business measures communicates values, channels employee thinking, and sets management priorities … Deciding what to measure and how to link measures to incentives are among the most important decisions a senior manager can make.”

Yesterday, I ended my blog with a link to an article from studyfundraising.info. In that article, they provided some suggestions on things to measure with regards to loyalty. I urge you to re-read that article and consider developing a scorecard or dashboard with some of those measures.

After a robust walk with the dogs this morning, I came up with some additional suggestions (some of which align with Reichheld and some don’t). So, here are some additional measures you may want to consider:

  • Donor renewal rate for your overall resource development program as well as for individual fundraising campaigns (this year versus last year)
  • Year-end evaluation of donor database with measurements focusing on:
                  * what percentage of donor records contributed in the last 12 months
                  * what percentage of donor records contributed 13 to 24 months ago
                  * what percentage of donor records contributed 25 to 36 months ago
                  * what percentage of donor records contributed 37 to 48 months ago
                  * what percentage of donor records contributed more than 49 months ago
  • What percentage of last year’s “first time donors” renewed their financial support (regardless of the fundraising campaign). In other words, how many second time gifts did you get from last year’s first time donors?
  • Comparison of this year’s pool of donors versus last year’s pool of donors on the average number of years a donor has supported your organization with a financial contribution
  • The number of “total number of private sector dollars raised divided by the total number of “stewardship touches” (e.g. all touches with donors and prospects who didn’t contribute) … compare this year’s number versus last year
  • For certain fundraising campaigns (e.g. annual campaign pledge drive), a comparison of how many renewing donors increased their contributions versus decreased versus stayed the same
  • For your organization’s “Top 50 Lifetime Donors,” the percentage increase of the total value of their contributions this year over last year (and perhaps even year-to-year over a five-year trending period)
  • Using an annual donor survey to measure “donor satisfaction” with your organization’s ability to impact change through programming

Tomorrow is the last day of this blog series on donor loyalty, and we’ll focus on strategies and activities to help build loyalty. However, I strongly urge you to invest time and resources in measurement systems and providing transparency in reporting these facts because it is this data that will drive strategy and performance.

Does your organization used specific “loyalty measures”? If so, please share your ideas with us in the comment section of this blog. If you think I’ve missed something, please weigh-in. There are no right or wrong answers.

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

A dog’s life: Part 3 of 5

This is my third of five posts focusing on Frederick Reichheld’s book “The Loyalty Effect” and how the concept of “loyalty” effects for-profit and non-profit corporations equally. If you don’t own a copy of this book, I suggest you buy it, read it, and change your approach to doing business.

Reichheld spends more than half of his book making the case for business leaders to understand the true costs of not understanding and incentivizing loyalty. Throughout the book he mathematically proves that:

  • Increasing customer, employee & investor loyalty results in a company spending less on customer acquisition in the long-term
  • Increasing customer, employee & investor loyalty results in increased profits
  • Increasing customer, employee & investor loyalty results in decreasing costs for the company
  • Increasing customer, employee & investor  loyalty results in more referrals and a self-perpetuating cycle of loyalty

After looking at these conclusions through a non-profit lens, I’ve come to the conclusion they are equally true for non-profit organizations. After all, how many times has one of your most loyal donors brought their friends to a special event fundraiser or hosted a cultivation or stewardship event for you?

I also found it interesting that Reichheld spends three chapters discussing the importance of finding and acquiring the “RIGHT” customers, employees & investors. While I understand how this applies to hiring non-profit employees, I had a problem wrapping my head around how it might apply to donors … until I remembered the Rubber Duck Race raffle/fundraiser I used to run every year.

In my six years of running that fundraiser, we built a donor database from a small handful of loyal donors to more than 12,000 donor records. While many of those donors enjoyed purchasing their $5.00 duck adoption for a chance to win a new car, I had a terribly difficult time getting many duck donors to cross over into my annual campaign or other resource development activities.

I also wonder what National Public Radio (NPR) fundraising professionals experience when they incentivize donors with premium giveaways. I suspect Reichheld would say that those who donate in spite of the giveaways would be the “RIGHT” kind of donors and those who contribute in order to get their names entered into a drawing for a new iPad cost you more money to retain in the long-term.

In the end, it becomes very clear to me that building a resource development program with “donor loyalty” at its heart requires a plan that invests (both time and money) heavily in:

  • donor identification & prospecting
  • prospect cultivation
  • donor stewardship

As I did in yesterday’s blog, I will end today with one more link to additional donor loyalty resources from the nice people at studyfundraising.info who posted “Donor Retention and Loyalty“. There is a great bibliography for those of you looking for good reading!

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

A dog’s life: Part 2 of 5

This is my second of five posts focusing on Frederick Reichheld’s book “The Loyalty Effect” and how the concept of “loyalty” effects for-profit and non-profit corporations equally. If you don’t own a copy of this book, I suggest you buy it, read it, and change your approach to doing business.

Yesterday’s post attempted to set the stage for deeper conversations around the importance of tracking, measuring and implementing loyalty strategies. Before we move forward, I am sharing this short passage from page 37 of the book:

“Imagine two companies, one with a customer retention rate of 95%, the other with a rate of 90%. The leak in the first firm’s customer bucket is 5% per year, and the second firm’s leak is twice as large, 10% per year. If both companies acquire new customers at the rate of 10% per year, the first will have a 5% net growth in customer inventory per year, while the other will have none. Over fourteen years, the first firm will double in size, but the second will have no real growth at all. Other things being equal, a 5-percentage-point advantage in customer retention translates into a growth advantage equal to a doubling of customer inventory every 14 years. An advantage of 10 percentage points accelerates the doubling to seven years.”

I share this passage from the book with you because oftentimes I find myself in a group of people nodding as we talk about LYBUNT rates (aka lapsed donor rates); however, seldom am I engaged in discussions about what does this REALLY mean. I read this small passage and suddenly I found myself involved in a deeper understanding of the entire problem of donor turnover. I hope you also had the same ah-ha moment.

Ask yourself this question: “Every time I talk or think about my organization’s resource development program, am I overcome by a feeling of exhaustion? Do I see volunteers having the same reaction?” If you answered ‘YES,” then you might be suffering from a donor loyalty issue that has squarely put your organization on the proverbial hamster wheel, which means you’re exerting lots of energy and only running in place (just like Reichheld described in the above passage).

What struck me hardest when reading this passage was that most non-profit organization’s experience turnover rates much higher than 5% or 10%.

As I did in yesterday’s blog, I will end today with a few links to additional donor loyalty resources: 1) “Building Donor Loyalty to Meet Your Your Long Term Fundraising Goals” Fund Raiser cyberzine and 2) “Top 9 Donor Loyalty Tweets” by Reinier Spruit who has blogging about Adrean Sargeant’s book “Essentials of Donor Loyalty“.

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

A dog’s world: Part 1 of 5

As promised on Friday, I unearthed my copy of The Loyalty Effect written by Frederick Reichheld and re-read it over the last few days. Today’s blog post is the first of many this week where I will share a sliver of the book with you and try to translate it into non-profit speak. In the end, it is my hope that we can all get a little closer to this idea of “being donor-centered”. I encourage you to buy a copy of this book and use it as your own “non-profit business bible”.

Essentially, the thesis of this book boils down to this simple idea: business leaders are too focused on the bottom line and profits and not focused enough on retention of customers, employees and investors. Ironically, focusing on numbers rather than people creates turnover (disloyalty) and ultimately causes profits and companies to fall apart. Reichheld advocates for a new business paradigm where CEOs start measuring and focusing on efforts to build loyalty throughout their company.

I echo his sentiment for non-profit leaders!

One of the more interesting things I learned in the first few chapters of this book was:

  • U.S. corporations lose between 10% to 30% of their customer base every year
  • U.S. corporations lose between 15% to 25% of their employee base every year
  • U.S. corporations lose more than 50% of their investors every year

For non-profit organizations, there are a number of different studies that illustrate “donor loyalty” floats somewhere between 50% and 75% per year, which essentially means resource development staff and volunteers are working hard to replace anywhere from 25% to 50% of their donor base just to break even EVERY YEAR.

To compare non-profit loyalty numbers to for-profit numbers, a decision needs to be made around this one issue — “Are non-profit “donors” the equivalent to for-profit “customers” when it comes to Reichheld’s book?”

While I’ve been telling my non-profit friends for years that donors are “investors” (and they really are), for the purpose of translating this book’s message I think we need to think “donor” every time Reichheld says “customer”.  Yes, I understand that donors are not our clients, but I just think the “economic dynamic” is closer for comparative purposes. If you disagree, please weigh-in using the comment section and let’s talk about it.

If you buy into this analysis, then non-profit leaders are equally bad if not worse off than their for-profit cousins when it comes to creating loyalty. So, it stands to reason that Reichheld would conclude that non-profit organizations are at substantial risk of bankruptcy unless they address this issue. I guess we shouldn’t be surprised that only 33% of non-profits survive beyond five years. (Compared to approximately 50% of for-profit biusnesses that are still alive after five years).

OK — this first installment sets the stage for a fun week of investigating the power of loyalty. I strongly encourage everyone to weigh-in with comments and questions as we embark on this journey. In the meantime, here are a few online resources and white papers if you want to deepen your knowledge of donor loyalty for this discussion:  1) Donor Loyalty: The Holy Grail of Fundraising by Craver, Mathews, Smith & Company, 2) The Number One Driver of Donor Loyalty is Satisfaction by Grizzard, 3) Building Donor Loyalty: Chapter 1 by Tony Poderis, and 4) Burk’s Blog by the queen of the donor-centered universe Penelope Burk.

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

A dog’s world: An Introduction

Earlier this week, one of my favorite bloggers, Jeff Brooks of Future Fundraising Now, posted a piece titled “Create good experiences for your donors” and my mind has been wrapped around it all week long.

In a nutshell, he draws a link between customer loyalty and profits and then goes on to suggust that a similar dynamic exists between a non-profit organization and its donors. It is really good and I suggest you click through and read it for yourself.

I think the reason I’ve been spinning on this all week is because a decade ago one of my favorite board members took me under his wing and played the role of Oprah. I was a new Executive Director and he was a wise bank President. One day after a board development committee meeting, he pulled me aside and handed me a book titled “The Loyalty Effect: The Hidden Force Behind Growth, Profits, and Lasting Value“. He urged me to read the book and encouraged me to return in a month so we can talk about how it applied to our non-profit situation.

Jeff Brooks mentions in his blog that he thinks a “good donor experience” includes:

  • getting the data right
  • being thankful
  • reporting back
  • offering choices around communication mediums

I think creating donor loyalty starts here and involves so much more, which is why I’ve dug out my old copy of “The Loyalty Effect”.  Here is my plan … I am dedicating all five blog posts next week to this book. I’ll read a few chapters, report back to you, and try to draw comparisions to the non-profit – donor experience. I am titling next week’s blog posts “A dog’s world” because nothing is more loyal in this world than “man’s best friend”. Right?

In the meantime, I encourage you to take a minute to weigh-in with your comments on “what do good donor experiences look and feel like? And how do you see non-profits building donor loyalty?”

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847

Non-profits and business plans

I am so excited because I am sitting down with our local YWCA’s CEO on Friday to share a cup of coffee and talk about developing a “business plan”.

In my experience, there are a lot of misconceptions about the role of business plans within a non-profit context. Part of the problem is that all business plan resources are really written with for-profit companies in mind.

I also find that many non-profit folks think of business plans as something they really are not. Business plans are not strategic plans … nor are they resource development plans. It is a document that demonstrates how a project or a program is financially feasible from both a revenue and expense side.

When I was the Executive Director at Boys & Girls Club of Elgin, I ended up writing a business plan as an exercise prior to kicking off a $3 million capital campaign and building project. We thought that writing a business plan would be wise because local donors were feeling “burnt” by another non-profit who had run a capital campaign and expanded their facility. Unfortunately, the organization hadn’t written a business plan and was ill-prepared for all the added expenses associated with facility expansion. In the end, the organization ended up selling its newly expanded building. Ouch!

The intent of our business plan was to demonstrate to donors that we had thought through the expense side of the budget as well as the revenue side. The plan included five years of forecasting. It spelled out exactly how we planned on “sustaining” ourselves and being good stewards of their resources, money, and trust.

I want to thank my friend George Hahne at Marketplace Media Group and Yoneco Evans at Organized Chaos Afterschool Consulting for their help in identifying business plan resources that I will pass along to my local YWCA tomorrow.

If you are working on a project that requires a business plan, here are some resources you may want to check-out:

Here is to your health!

Erik Anderson
Owner, The Healthy Non-Profit LLC
eanderson847@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/#!/eanderson847
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=1021153653
http://www.linkedin.com/in/erikanderson847